B.BlockAxis⌕ Search
Menu

AML, KYC, CDD and EDD explained

Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing frameworks seek to prevent misuse of the financial system.

IntermediateContent revised · 13.09.20263 min reading · allow 5–10 more minutes for the workshopBlockAxis

Your learning plan

Combine identity, context and ongoing monitoring

By the end, explain the diagram in your own words, solve the case and justify the correction.

Prerequisites : Hot, warm and cold wallets

Level 2 · Intermediate →

Reading path · 25 / 35 · Intermediate

Key takeaway

Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing frameworks seek to prevent misuse of the financial system.

The essentials

Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing frameworks seek to prevent misuse of the financial system. KYC is commonly used for identifying and understanding customers. Customer due diligence extends to verification, beneficial ownership, relationship purpose and ongoing monitoring under the applicable framework.

How it works

Enhanced due diligence addresses higher-risk circumstances with additional measures. It is not simply collecting more documents from everyone. A risk-based approach considers customer, product, geography and delivery channels, with documented decisions and escalation. FATF uses VASP terminology; MiCA uses CASP for its own defined scope.

What to watch

Blockchain analytics can flag patterns or exposure, but an attribution is not necessarily a proven identity or unlawful act. Review data quality, false positives and context. Suspicious-activity reporting and sanctions controls have specific legal requirements that vary by jurisdiction; this conceptual overview is not a reporting decision for an individual case.

Understand the details

Customer identification establishes who the customer is under the applicable process; risk assessment asks how the relationship and activity should be understood. Transaction monitoring adds information over time. None of these is interchangeable with simply observing a wallet address or purchasing a blockchain analytics score.

Boundaries and common mistakes

Analytics labels are evidence to evaluate, not infallible identity findings. Shared services, indirect exposure and incorrect attribution can complicate interpretation. A review needs documented reasoning, appropriate escalation and access controls. The precise obligations and actions follow applicable law and institutional policy, not a universal score threshold.

The mechanism at a glance

  1. Identity and relationship
  2. Observed activity
  3. Contextual review
  4. Documented decision
Combine identity, context and ongoing monitoring. Conceptual map: read these four landmarks together with the explanation above.
Applied workshop · work at your own pace

Apply the lesson to a case

A previously low-activity account receives an unusual transfer from an address labeled by an analytics provider. List what is known, inferred and missing. Consider customer context and label provenance before reaching a decision.

Why should the review preserve the difference between facts and inference?

Choose one answer.

Terms in this lesson
CASP
Crypto-asset service provider, a defined category under MiCA. Its scope should not be assumed identical to FATF’s VASP category.
Prepare a correction note

Describe the passage and the proposed correction. This creates a local note for you to share; it sends nothing. Do not include personal or confidential information.