B.BlockAxis⌕ Search
Menu

Impermanent loss with a worked example

Impermanent loss measures how a liquidity-provider position differs from simply holding its initial assets as relative prices change.

IntermediateContent revised · 13.09.20264 min reading · allow 5–10 more minutes for the workshopBlockAxis
← My learning journey
Workshop · 20 XP

Awarded once after a correct answer.

The question we will work through

Compare providing liquidity with simply holding

Useful first : Liquidity pools and automated market makers

Reading path · 28 / 41 · Intermediate

Key takeaway

Impermanent loss measures how a liquidity-provider position differs from simply holding its initial assets as relative prices change.

The essentials

Impermanent loss measures how a liquidity-provider position differs from simply holding its initial assets as relative prices change. It is a comparison of strategies, not necessarily a negative return in currency terms. Trading fees can offset the difference but need not do so.

How it works

For an idealised equal-value, full-range constant-product pool without fees, the relative value is 2 × sqrt(r) / (1 + r), where r is the price ratio change. If one asset doubles relative to the other, the pool position is about 94.28% of the hold strategy: a 5.72% shortfall before fees.

What to watch

This formula does not directly describe concentrated liquidity, weighted pools or lending positions. A price returning to the starting ratio can remove the modelled divergence, but there is no guarantee it will return. Withdrawal realises the position at that time; the label impermanent should not be interpreted as a promise of recovery.

Understand the details

Divergence loss compares the pool position with holding the same initial assets outside the pool. In a fee-free 50/50 constant-product model, arbitrage changes the quantities held as the relative price moves. The provider ends up with less of the asset that appreciated and more of the other asset.

Boundaries and common mistakes

The word impermanent can mislead: withdrawal realizes the difference at that moment, and prices may never return. Fees may offset the gap but are uncertain. Concentrated liquidity changes the exposure and can leave a position entirely in one asset outside its range. Compare like-for-like values and include fees separately.

The mechanism at a glance

SEE THE CONNECTIONS
Compare providing liquidity with simply holdingFour connected ideas
  1. 01Same starting assets
  2. 02Relative price changes
  3. 03Pool rebalances quantities
  4. 04Compare with holding

Read these as connected concepts, not necessarily consecutive steps.

Read the explanation

Divergence loss compares the pool position with holding the same initial assets outside the pool. In a fee-free 50/50 constant-product model, arbitrage changes the quantities held as the relative price moves. The provider ends up with less of the asset that appreciated and more of the other asset.

The distinction that changes the analysis

01Pool position
02Holding benchmark

Measure both alternatives at the same final prices and with the same starting assets. A pool can gain in euro value while still underperforming holding. Fees belong in a separate line so you can see whether they offset that relative difference.

Explain it yourself

Revisit the case above. Name what is established, what remains to be checked and the evidence needed to conclude. A strong answer addresses both sides of the diagram.

Applied workshop · work at your own pace

Apply the lesson to a case

Start with 1 X worth 100 and 100 stable units. If X doubles to 200, simply holding is worth 300. In the idealized fee-free pool, the position becomes approximately 0.7071 X and 141.42 stable units, worth 282.84.

Is the pool below the initial value, and is it below holding?

Choose one answer.

Terms in this lesson
Impermanent loss
The value shortfall of certain liquidity-provider positions relative to holding the original assets after relative prices change.
Prepare a correction note

Describe the passage and the proposed correction. This creates a local note for you to share; it sends nothing. Do not include personal or confidential information.

Sources and references

References for the mechanisms described. Numerical examples are hypothetical unless stated otherwise. Check the applicable version, network and jurisdiction.

References reviewed on 21 September 2026. All sources →